Jon Glass wrote:
>
> I don't. Actually, if it were about the same screen size as my Newton
> (but not resolution), I would probably like one, but 9.7"??? What are
> they thinking! I think people wishing for something this huge haven't
> really used a tablet that big. It is more than a bit on the large
> size.
Jon, 9.7" is just about 25 cm so with a 4x3 ratio it would be 15 cm x 20
cm or about 6" x 8" (actually 5.9" x 7.875"")
My 2100 usable screen is 3.75" x 8" or a ratio of 1:2.1333... which
calculates out to a diagonal of 2.356"
Now using the same screen ratio as the 2100 gives us a screen that is
approx 10.6 cm x 22.6 cm or about 4.17" x 8.9".
Add in casing and you will have a tablet 5" x 10" (12.7 cm x 25.4 cm) or
about the size of a Newton keyboard but 1" (2.54 cm) wider.
-- Sincerely, Dennis B. Swaney "Windows is a command-line OS with a GUI shell while Mac System 10 is ... oh, never mind." ==================================================================== The NewtonTalk Mailing List - http://www.newtontalk.net/ The Official Newton FAQ - http://www.splorp.com/newton/faq/ The Newton Glossary - http://www.splorp.com/newton/glossary/ WikiWikiNewt - http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/ ====================================================================Received on Mon Jul 13 17:28:07 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jul 13 2009 - 18:30:01 EDT