On 18/07/02 14:59, "Jeffrey M. Swiger" <n8noe_at_mac.com> wrote:
> I Affirm your statement!..
> I think a Lite version would be the best for me and my use. About
> the only thing I use is the ( Mac.Com ) E-Mail address, and really
> nothing else. I like the Mac Address, as I use it here, But If I have
> to, I'll go elsewhere. I just loaded the Backup software on this
> machine, and it's Slick, but I have others that are FREE top me here. I
> just cant see spending the $99.99 a year.. If you sign now, you get the
> first year @ 49.00, This might not be all bad for a year, but LITE is
> ( I Think ) the way to go here. I wonder if they might do something like
> this ASAP, After all the Bitchin' about this?.... Jeff
I'm not sure but I think I've read on another list that once you enroll to
try the .Mac service, you have the ability to convert your .mac.com email
address to a free one. It is not mentioned anywhere but somebody on another
list mentioned that this option was there, in the account page.
FYI and YMMV...
-Laurent.
-- =========================================================================== Laurent Daudelin Developer, Multifamily, ESO, Fannie Mae mailto:Laurent_Daudelin_at_fanniemae.com Washington, DC, USA ************************* Usual disclaimers apply ************************* bug-compatible adj.: [common] Said of a design or revision that has been badly compromised by a requirement to be compatible with fossils or misfeatures in other programs or (esp.) previous releases of itself. "MS-DOS 2.0 used \ as apath separator to be bug-compatible with some cretin's choice of / as an option character in 1.0."-- Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.guns-media.com/mirrors/newton/faq/ This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Aug 01 2002 - 06:02:52 EDT