Re: [NTLK] "Q Re-print" size poll

From: Marco Mailand (Newton2k1_at_mac.com)
Date: Thu Jul 18 2002 - 08:38:15 EDT

Next message: Marco Mailand: "Re: [NTLK] "Q Re-print" size poll"
Previous message: Adrian Smith: "Re: [NTLK] Dot-mac overpriced petition, at over 4000 signatures *already*!"
In reply to: machula: "Re: [NTLK] "Q Re-print" size poll"
Next in thread: Marco Mailand: "Re: [NTLK] "Q Re-print" size poll"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> ahh yes... just what I meant!
> use streamline for vectorizing...
Adobe Streamline is really a cool thing. I've tried it a few times but in
the end ONLY a re-entered from scratch AutoCAD drawing will provide
satisfying accuracy. Streamline will create sort of exact vectors but always
including optical distortions or inaccuracies of the original. The fresh
AutoCAD DWG or DXF would provide sufficiently exact data for CAM beside 3D
information too.

-- With best regards / Viele Gruesse

Marco Mailand http://slsbd.psi.ch/timing http://slsbd.psi.ch/~mmailand https://www.paypal.com/refer/pal=YYD3VUXUVD2YG

-- Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.guns-media.com/mirrors/newton/faq/ This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net

Next message: Marco Mailand: "Re: [NTLK] "Q Re-print" size poll"
Previous message: Adrian Smith: "Re: [NTLK] Dot-mac overpriced petition, at over 4000 signatures *already*!"
In reply to: machula: "Re: [NTLK] "Q Re-print" size poll"
Next in thread: Marco Mailand: "Re: [NTLK] "Q Re-print" size poll"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Aug 01 2002 - 06:02:50 EDT