Re: [NTLK] Dot-mac overpriced petition, at over 4000 signatures *already*!

• Next message: Marco Mailand: "Re: [NTLK] "Q Re-print" size poll"
• Previous message: Adrian Smith: "Re: [NTLK] Dot-mac overpriced petition, at over 4000 signatures *already*!"
• Maybe in reply to: Jim Witte: "[NTLK] Dot-mac overpriced petition, at over 4000 signatures *already*!"
• Next in thread: Richard Lowrey: "Re: [NTLK] Dot-mac overpriced petition, at over 4000 signatures *already*!"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

>Honestly, I don't think it's worth petitioning Apple over. I think if
>there's anything to be done, however, it would most likely have to be a
>lawsuit, class action, against Apple by people who purchased Apple
>hardware with the understanding that iTools was "free for life" as Apple
>claimed it was.
>

Where did they claim that?

Adrian

-- 
Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.guns-media.com/mirrors/newton/faq/
This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net

• Next message: Marco Mailand: "Re: [NTLK] "Q Re-print" size poll"
• Previous message: Adrian Smith: "Re: [NTLK] Dot-mac overpriced petition, at over 4000 signatures *already*!"
• Maybe in reply to: Jim Witte: "[NTLK] Dot-mac overpriced petition, at over 4000 signatures *already*!"
• Next in thread: Richard Lowrey: "Re: [NTLK] Dot-mac overpriced petition, at over 4000 signatures *already*!"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Aug 01 2002 - 06:02:50 EDT