Re: [NTLK] Newton 2100 Loudspeaker quality?

From: Chris Searles (csearles_at_netcologne.de)
Date: Wed Dec 26 2001 - 13:44:49 EST

Next message: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] Newton 2100 Loudspeaker quality?"
Previous message: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] Newton 2100 Loudspeaker quality?"
Maybe in reply to: Chris Searles: "[NTLK] Newton 2100 Loudspeaker quality?"
Next in thread: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] Newton 2100 Loudspeaker quality?"
Reply: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] Newton 2100 Loudspeaker quality?"
Reply: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] Newton 2100 Loudspeaker quality?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

>As long as you record at the highest possible setting.
>(I believe that's 8k?)which has the audio quality of
>an AM radio or a digital cell phone.

Could you please give me a rough ratio, so many minutes = so many KB?

-- 
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] Newton 2100 Loudspeaker quality?"
Previous message: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] Newton 2100 Loudspeaker quality?"
Maybe in reply to: Chris Searles: "[NTLK] Newton 2100 Loudspeaker quality?"
Next in thread: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] Newton 2100 Loudspeaker quality?"
Reply: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] Newton 2100 Loudspeaker quality?"
Reply: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] Newton 2100 Loudspeaker quality?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Jan 02 2002 - 12:02:06 EST