Afternoon Ryan,
I don't think anyone is disagreeing that Apple does not presently
allow 3rd party applications to run in the background and I think most
would agree that there is an increased level of functionality to be
found in allowing 3rd party applications to run in the background.
There are also potential concerns regarding system performance, UI
responsiveness, HW resources available, battery runtime, etc to be
weighed against this. From my brief look at this discussion it appears
no one is arguing about those things, for my own part I was
interjecting that there is a very large difference between an OS not
supporting multitasking and engineers / developers making a decision
not to allow background applications. These two things are
fundamentally separate.
It isn't limited multitasking, that ignores technical facts about the
operating system. Sorta like claiming the functionality of APIs not
available to 3rd parties do not exist, that would be … untrue.
-DME
On Jul 21, 2009, at 1:27 PM, Ryan Vetter wrote:
>
> Hi:
>
> I am not completely clear on what you are trying to say, but the
> point I was making is that the iPhone is limited because it does
> not, for the most part, allow multi-tasking background apps. This
> causes usability issues, like, for instance, with the Skype app.
> When that changes, the phone will leap once again, and I hope the OS
> 4.0 is not more of the same, but some GUI tweaks as well.
>
> Here is a good real world take on the iPhone's limited multi-tasking
> abilities:
>
> http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/editorial-taking-the-iphone-3gs-off-the-job-market/
>
> Ryan
====================================================================
The NewtonTalk Mailing List - http://www.newtontalk.net/
The Official Newton FAQ - http://www.splorp.com/newton/faq/
The Newton Glossary - http://www.splorp.com/newton/glossary/
WikiWikiNewt - http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/
====================================================================
Received on Tue Jul 21 18:21:21 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jul 21 2009 - 18:30:01 EDT