Please bear with me but I've never used a Palm OS device before, but it is an
interesting discussion, even for a bystander.
If the OS works for its users, why does there have to be an endless treadmill of
upgrades and new versions? What was so wrong with Palm OS that it became a
"dead horse?" I thought the point of POS was that it was minimalist and simple.
Isn't that a recipe for upgrades to be few and far between?
Cheers
Tony
[snip]they put a lot of .x and .x.y numbers behind the dead horse that is palm
OS 5
(which they are STILL beating today) so I'll trust they have changed when I see
V2 and V3 in the same decade (they've been beating OS 5 for going on 6 years
after all).[snip]
====================================================================
The NewtonTalk Mailing List - http://www.newtontalk.net/
The Official Newton FAQ - http://www.splorp.com/newton/faq/
The Newton Glossary - http://www.splorp.com/newton/glossary/
WikiWikiNewt - http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/
====================================================================
Received on Sat Jul 18 20:47:26 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jul 18 2009 - 21:30:00 EDT