Ryan,
> Sure, there was MP3 players, but the market was nascent and not
> well defined. Not only did Apple offer a superior device, but they
> coupled it with music services and easy syncability which the world
> ate up. So they created a market for MP3 players.
It is exactly this coupling with other services that have defined
recent non-Mac product lines. Just doing a tablet for the sake of it
does not a convincing product make.
We should search for justifications for a tablet outside the merely
operational ones to see if there is a good business case for building
such a thing.
Could Apple be thinking about getting into book reading? Steve tells
us the no one reads books anymore - sounds like an endorsement to me :-)
Could collaborative use of tablet, in the way that Microsoft are
experimenting with the Surface device, be a possibility? The fold-
flat eMate display encourages more than one user to be involved in
the way that a laptop can never really achieve.
Could the tablet extend the functionality of the Touch or Mac
products in some useful way - intelligent external screen for any
device? Some other tightly-bound assistance which only Apple products
could achieve?
What might the central message of a Apple tablet advertisement - will
it resonate with new buyers?
It is in these synergies that a more complete picture might emerge.
Joel.
====================================================================
The NewtonTalk Mailing List - http://www.newtontalk.net/
The Official Newton FAQ - http://www.splorp.com/newton/faq/
The Newton Glossary - http://www.splorp.com/newton/glossary/
WikiWikiNewt - http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/
====================================================================
Received on Mon Jul 13 19:17:29 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jul 13 2009 - 19:30:00 EDT