Re: [NTLK] More MacPad Rumors

...we're in this forum because of something that happened at Apple while Sculley was there, but at the end of the day, it's because of Apple.

I didn't mention Jobs, actually.

No need to quibble though. I get your point and I think you got mine.

(I wonder whether there's a BeOS forum, where they argue whether Be should make the OS compatible with Core 2 Duo processors. Oh, yeah, that's right, there is no Be.)

-- Peter
pjfraser@mac.com

 
On Monday, July 13, 2009, at 02:38PM, "RCMP_Mike" <rcmpmike@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Peter,
>
>You forget. We are here in this forum because of Sculley, not Jobs.
>
>--------------------------------------------------
>From: "Peter Fraser" <pjfraser@mac.com>
>Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 15:31
>To: <newtontalk@newtontalk.net>
>Subject: Re: [NTLK] More MacPad Rumors
>
>> If Sculley were still at Apple's helm it would be far simpler, like
>> you say, because there would no longer be any Apple to complain about.
>> He drove it into the ground, but doofus Amelio didn't have the
>> wherewithal to finish the job (altho he certainly tried)!
>>
>
>
>====================================================================
>The NewtonTalk Mailing List - http://www.newtontalk.net/
>The Official Newton FAQ - http://www.splorp.com/newton/faq/
>The Newton Glossary - http://www.splorp.com/newton/glossary/
>WikiWikiNewt - http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/
>====================================================================
>
>
>
>
>

====================================================================
The NewtonTalk Mailing List - http://www.newtontalk.net/
The Official Newton FAQ - http://www.splorp.com/newton/faq/
The Newton Glossary - http://www.splorp.com/newton/glossary/
WikiWikiNewt - http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/
====================================================================
Received on Mon Jul 13 18:05:44 2009