James Fraser wrote:
> To be honest, I was always under the impression that it was the high
> price point (relative to full-blown desktops) that contributed, at
> least in part, to the death of the Newton. But perhaps it was the
> simple fact that the Newton was available in such limited numbers
> that it simply never had a possibility to reach the Critical Mass
> needed for a computing device to gain widespread popularity (and
> therefore continue to be made)?
>
For me, it was definitely the price point. I could never afford, nor
could I ever justify, the original cost. When the MP100's started being
blown out at $200 or so by various vendors, that was the price point I
needed and I grabbed one. Used it religiously for years. Got a 130
later at a similar price, picked up a couple 2100's even later.
Sadly, I really no longer use them because they just don't fit in with
the way I do things now. But I would imagine that the original price
(wasn't it close to a grand?) prevented a significant amount of users
from taking a chance on a new concept.
-- Paul Braun Valparaiso, IN "It's such a fine line between stupid, and clever." - David St. Hubbins "Enjoy every sandwich." - Warren Zevon "The Fountain of Youth is a state of mind." - The Ides of March ==================================================================== The NewtonTalk Mailing List - http://www.newtontalk.net/ The Official Newton FAQ - http://www.splorp.com/newton/faq/ The Newton Glossary - http://www.splorp.com/newton/glossary/ WikiWikiNewt - http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/ ====================================================================Received on Sun Nov 16 08:53:13 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Nov 16 2008 - 09:30:00 EST