Re: [NTLK] New iMac - anybody else think it looks like a tablet?

From: Jim Witte (jswitte_at_bloomington.in.us)
Date: Sun Sep 05 2004 - 16:46:00 PDT

Next message: Mike Detlefsen: "Re: [NTLK] New iMac - anybody else think it looks like a tablet?"
Previous message: David Abramowitz: "[NTLK] WWNC - How was It?"
In reply to: Jared Bland: "Re: [NTLK] New iMac - anybody else think it looks like a tablet?"
Next in thread: Mike Detlefsen: "Re: [NTLK] New iMac - anybody else think it looks like a tablet?"
Reply: Mike Detlefsen: "Re: [NTLK] New iMac - anybody else think it looks like a tablet?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Do we know that it's actually 180, thought? Doesn't seem to me that
there would be anything in there that isn't in an iBook, and it'll run
off 24VDC*1.9A = about 45 W.

> I think the main problem is the 180W power requirement. Aside from
> that, I have no idea what would be stopping them...

Jim

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/

Next message: Mike Detlefsen: "Re: [NTLK] New iMac - anybody else think it looks like a tablet?"
Previous message: David Abramowitz: "[NTLK] WWNC - How was It?"
In reply to: Jared Bland: "Re: [NTLK] New iMac - anybody else think it looks like a tablet?"
Next in thread: Mike Detlefsen: "Re: [NTLK] New iMac - anybody else think it looks like a tablet?"
Reply: Mike Detlefsen: "Re: [NTLK] New iMac - anybody else think it looks like a tablet?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Sep 05 2004 - 17:30:02 PDT