Re: [NTLK] [OT] culinary question

From: Robert Benschop (rbenschop_at_euronet.nl)
Date: Thu Jan 30 2003 - 05:07:49 PST

Next message: This Old Newt: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] culinary question"
Previous message: This Old Newt: "Re: [NTLK] culinary question"
In reply to: This Old Newt: "Re: [NTLK] culinary question"
Next in thread: This Old Newt: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] culinary question"
Reply: This Old Newt: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] culinary question"
Reply: Martyn Wilkinson: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] culinary question"
Maybe reply: Grant Hutchinson: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] culinary question"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

on 30-01-2003 2:53, This Old Newt at rich_at_thisoldnewt.net wrote:

> PLEASE SEE THE ARCHIVES OR FAQ FOR RECENT DISCUSSIONS AND INFORMATION ABOUT
> THIS DISH.
> No need to go through this again.

Though I live Poutine I couldn't agree more.

To make sure that if people do continue this thread I added the (overdue)
[OT] to the subject.

Robert Benschop

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

Next message: This Old Newt: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] culinary question"
Previous message: This Old Newt: "Re: [NTLK] culinary question"
In reply to: This Old Newt: "Re: [NTLK] culinary question"
Next in thread: This Old Newt: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] culinary question"
Reply: This Old Newt: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] culinary question"
Reply: Martyn Wilkinson: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] culinary question"
Maybe reply: Grant Hutchinson: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] culinary question"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 30 2003 - 18:30:02 PST