From: Robert Benschop (rbenschop_at_euronet.nl)
Date: Thu Dec 11 2003 - 07:12:21 PST
On 11-dec-03, at 15:54, john reeve wrote:
>> I also can't understand why the G4 Cube got added to the list. Does
>> anyone know why it was considered a failure?
Looks like we're talking business failures here, and they all were.
That said, I have quite a few Newtons and a Cube as my main computer,
(80 GB 7200 rpm, 1 GB RAM, 800 MHz) terrific hardware to use...
> I think the reason it was considered a failure was because there was a
> problem with the casing - some machines case's started to crack. Shame
> cos that thing looked cool as you like.
Apparently there were never cracks but a lot of people bought them for
the design first and didn't expect moulding lines on the casing.
Robert Benschop
-- This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Dec 11 2003 - 08:00:00 PST