Re: [NTLK] Proof Jobs isn't an idiot (was: Proof Jobs is an idiot)

From: Mark Rollins (mark_at_mrollins.com)
Date: Wed Nov 13 2002 - 12:58:26 EST

Next message: Mark Flisher: "[NTLK] 16022 error."
Previous message: J. E. Simons: "Re: [NTLK] Some Observations"
Maybe in reply to: John Anderson: "[NTLK] Proof Jobs isn't an idiot (was: Proof Jobs is an idiot)"
Next in thread: Brian Hugh Warren: "Re: [NTLK] Proof Jobs isn't an idiot (was: Proof Jobs is an idiot)"
Reply: Brian Hugh Warren: "Re: [NTLK] Proof Jobs isn't an idiot (was: Proof Jobs is an idiot)"
Reply: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] Proof Jobs isn't an idiot (was: Proof Jobs is an idiot)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> Like all those Apple switch
> commercials are real? uh-huh.

The FTC (Federal Trade Commission) makes it very bad for companies who
aren't damned sure their claims are true...

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

Next message: Mark Flisher: "[NTLK] 16022 error."
Previous message: J. E. Simons: "Re: [NTLK] Some Observations"
Maybe in reply to: John Anderson: "[NTLK] Proof Jobs isn't an idiot (was: Proof Jobs is an idiot)"
Next in thread: Brian Hugh Warren: "Re: [NTLK] Proof Jobs isn't an idiot (was: Proof Jobs is an idiot)"
Reply: Brian Hugh Warren: "Re: [NTLK] Proof Jobs isn't an idiot (was: Proof Jobs is an idiot)"
Reply: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] Proof Jobs isn't an idiot (was: Proof Jobs is an idiot)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Dec 02 2002 - 22:02:42 EST