Re: [NTLK] 2100 or Upgraded 2000??

From: David Ensteness (denstene_at_mac.com)
Date: Sun Nov 03 2002 - 15:18:16 EST

Next message: Alexander Marianski: "[NTLK] 2100 door retaining clips"
Previous message: Katarina Gubler: "Re: [NTLK] ROBIN BROWN - Shipping Rant"
Maybe in reply to: Brian Niles: "[NTLK] 2100 or Upgraded 2000??"
Next in thread: Ian Moffatt: "Re: [NTLK] 2100 or Upgraded 2000??"
Reply: Ian Moffatt: "Re: [NTLK] 2100 or Upgraded 2000??"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

An upgraded 2000 and a 2100 are identical, only difference is the print on the case.

On Sunday, Nov 03, 2002, at 05:26AM, Brian Niles <niles_at_targetx.com> wrote:

>
>I'm going to buy either a 2100 or an upgraded 2000. Does anyone have
>an opinion on which would be best? I was recommended to save my money
>and do the upgraded 2000. Any problems or limitations over an original
>2100?

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

Next message: Alexander Marianski: "[NTLK] 2100 door retaining clips"
Previous message: Katarina Gubler: "Re: [NTLK] ROBIN BROWN - Shipping Rant"
Maybe in reply to: Brian Niles: "[NTLK] 2100 or Upgraded 2000??"
Next in thread: Ian Moffatt: "Re: [NTLK] 2100 or Upgraded 2000??"
Reply: Ian Moffatt: "Re: [NTLK] 2100 or Upgraded 2000??"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Dec 02 2002 - 22:01:57 EST