Re: [NTLK] "Q Re-print" size poll

• Next message: Marco Mailand: "Re: [NTLK] "Q Re-print" size poll"
• Previous message: eschneck_at_mindspring.com: "Re: [NTLK] "Q Re-print" size poll"
• Maybe in reply to: Chris Chapman: "[NTLK] "Q Re-print" size poll"
• Next in thread: LA GREEN: "Re: [NTLK] "Q Re-print" size poll"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Half size would be okay. Bigger would be good too :)
The full 44" could be considered excessive, but hey, some times you need a
little excess-

/sam

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gregory J. Wayman [mailto:gwayman_at_mac.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 12:15 AM
> To: newtontalk_at_newtontalk.net
> Subject: Re: [NTLK] "Q Re-print" size poll
>
>
>
> Full size, here
>
> Jim Witte wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Well, I won the blueprints (for only $355 too, amazing
> ;-) Tomorrow I'm going over to find out about screen
> printing. The original is 44 inches square. What size
> reprints would people be interested in? I'm thinking either
> half-size or third-size.

-- 
Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.guns-media.com/mirrors/newton/faq/
This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net

• Next message: Marco Mailand: "Re: [NTLK] "Q Re-print" size poll"
• Previous message: eschneck_at_mindspring.com: "Re: [NTLK] "Q Re-print" size poll"
• Maybe in reply to: Chris Chapman: "[NTLK] "Q Re-print" size poll"
• Next in thread: LA GREEN: "Re: [NTLK] "Q Re-print" size poll"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Aug 01 2002 - 06:02:46 EDT