Re: [NTLK] Palms - was re HWR rate and Grafitti

From: Smith, Bradley (bradley.smith_at_artisansw.com)
Date: Wed Jul 17 2002 - 06:40:15 EDT

Next message: machula: "Re: [NTLK] "Q Re-print" size poll"
Previous message: Marco Mailand: "Re: [NTLK] Newton UMP2k microphone problems..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

I wouldn't bother Les. The only thing Palms are good for is stopping your
fingers from falling off ;-)

Brad

> -----Original Message-----
> From: L vRooy [mailto:ara_at_dwaf.pwv.gov.za]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:35
> To: newtontalk_at_newtontalk.net
> Subject: [NTLK] re HWR rate and Grafitti
>
>
>
> Frank wrote inter alia
> -- If you check the Newton version, be aware that it doesn't
> even --come close to the Palm feeling bothin terms of
> functionality and of --speed. But it is enough to get the idea.
>
> Rather than sending you my dead 130, I think I'll trade it
> towards a Palm. BTW, does it matter which Palm?
>
> Les
>
> Les vRooy
> <lvrooy_at_iafrica.com>
>
>
>
> --
> Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
> Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.guns-media.com/mirrors/newton/faq/
> This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net
>

-- 
Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.guns-media.com/mirrors/newton/faq/
This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net

Next message: machula: "Re: [NTLK] "Q Re-print" size poll"
Previous message: Marco Mailand: "Re: [NTLK] Newton UMP2k microphone problems..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Aug 01 2002 - 06:02:46 EDT