"I'm not a theoretical physicist or any thing like that " but I love
Albert Einstein and Stephen Hawking. Einstein suggests that a
relationship exists between energy and matter, Matter is not infinitely
compressable because in addition to mass it also occupies space. If the
cosmos as we know it did begin with the big bang ( a rapid expansion
from a singularity to all that we know and hold dear) , then it must be
possible for escape to occure from a super massive black hole. I also
seem to recall that Hawking speculated that matter may be able to escape
a black hole through a process something like evaporation. This would
imply that an energetic churning occures within a black hole, I have a
difficult time imagining a single point having internal agitation.
Woody
L vRooy wrote:
>Jochen wrote
>--But you're right, the black hole itself doesn't get
>--bigger, only heavier.
>
>This means matter is infinely compressible?
>How far from the event horizon does this singularity exists (variable of course)? The pictures usually show this as a vortex shape, does the formulas predict that?
>
>excuzatti if this is a bit 1st y college Q.s
>
>Les vRooy
><lvrooy_at_iafrica.com>
>
>
>
-- Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.guns-media.com/mirrors/newton/faq/ This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Aug 01 2002 - 06:02:18 EDT