[NTLK] Faster that 57600 with NCU?

From: John Goggan (jgoggan_at_dcg.com)
Date: Tue Feb 26 2002 - 21:19:49 EST

Next message: JForsterMD_at_aol.com: "Re: [NTLK] BTI batteries/32 meg cards"
Previous message: Eric Byrne: "Re: [NTLK] Tactile.com update"
Next in thread: Smith, Bradley: "Re: [NTLK] Faster that 57600 with NCU?"
Maybe reply: Smith, Bradley: "Re: [NTLK] Faster that 57600 with NCU?"
Maybe reply: Smith, Bradley: "Re: [NTLK] Faster that 57600 with NCU?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Today, while searching around, I cam across this:

http://www.ee.cityu.edu.hk/~clli/unixnpi.html

Basically, it is a package installer for *nix boxes. What is interesting is
that there are ser115200.pkg and ser230400.pkg packages for use with MP2x00
units. Do these units reliably support these speeds? If so, then shouldn't
we be able to use a hacked NCU to do above the currently-hacked 57600 NCU
transfers? I'd certainly love to at least to 115200 transfers -- possibly
even 230400 is my PC serial port can handle it reliably...

Any thoughts on this?

- John...

-- 
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: JForsterMD_at_aol.com: "Re: [NTLK] BTI batteries/32 meg cards"
Previous message: Eric Byrne: "Re: [NTLK] Tactile.com update"
Next in thread: Smith, Bradley: "Re: [NTLK] Faster that 57600 with NCU?"
Maybe reply: Smith, Bradley: "Re: [NTLK] Faster that 57600 with NCU?"
Maybe reply: Smith, Bradley: "Re: [NTLK] Faster that 57600 with NCU?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sat Mar 02 2002 - 10:03:54 EST