Well, I think that the changes need to be to an extent
where the new logo can not be construed to represend
the original item. Logo infringement is all about the
dillution of brand recognition. In this case, it is
clear that these if a level of confusion between the
Newton logo and this other company. I just threw up
the page: http://newton.tek-ed.com/blatant.html to
illustrate that there is no difference in the logos in
the very least!
Ed
web/gadget guru
http://newton.tek-ed.com (download Newton packages)
http://65.84.243.167 (my NPDS server well, not for
today unfortunately)
--- "Eric L. Strobel" <fyzycyst_at_home.com> wrote:
>
> somewhere near the temporal coordinates of 2/10/02
> 1:42 AM, the entity known
> as Ed Kummel transmitted the following from
> tech_ed_at_yahoo.com:
>
> >
> > I made some changes to the page that I put
> together
> > showing the blatant copy of the Newton Logo. I
> found
> > this really cool Javascript that I put to good
> use.
> > After I made some changes it performs beautifully!
>
> Coolness!!!
>
> But the question is, does simply making slight
> alterations protect from
> accusation of infringement??
>
> - Eric.
>
> --
>
> Eric Strobel (fyzycyst_at_NOSPAM^mailaps.org)
=====
Just because you're a genius, doesn't make you a smart guy!
- The Powerpuff Girls -
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings!
http://greetings.yahoo.com
-- This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sat Mar 02 2002 - 10:02:46 EST