Re: [NTLK] eMate vs. 2100

From: Woo Lee (vitcitylb_at_earthlink.net)
Date: Sun Feb 10 2002 - 01:33:25 EST

Next message: Woo Lee: "Re: [NTLK] Newts Cape and Yahoo Finance"
Previous message: Woo Lee: "Re: [NTLK] Apple PDA?"
Maybe in reply to: Rolf Brakvatne: "[NTLK] eMate vs. 2100"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Yup, 'processing message...' takes processing speed and enough free heap =
and storage space.
No matter how fast you add stuff to the blender, it matters how fast the =
blender is, so to spew.
------------------
>How is the e-mail download speed of a 2100 compared to that of an eMate
>(600K free memory with a 32MB card). This would be a DSL connection via a
>Farrallon card. 28 messages (small) take 6 to 7 minutes to download on the
>eMate. Would I see a large difference moving to a 2100.
>Thanks.
>
>RB
------------------

---------------------
!ooW %-)
Pres. of Los Angeles Newton Users Group!

-- 
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: Woo Lee: "Re: [NTLK] Newts Cape and Yahoo Finance"
Previous message: Woo Lee: "Re: [NTLK] Apple PDA?"
Maybe in reply to: Rolf Brakvatne: "[NTLK] eMate vs. 2100"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sat Mar 02 2002 - 10:02:28 EST