Re: [NTLK] Shareware/Freeware Licenses

From: Robert Benschop (rbenschop_at_mac.com)
Date: Wed Sep 05 2001 - 18:29:00 EDT

Next message: Oliver Brose: "Re: [NTLK] voice recognition Newton"
Previous message: Seth Vidal: "[NTLK] blasphemy and maybe some hope"
In reply to: John M. Powell: "Re: [NTLK] Shareware/Freeware Licenses"
Next in thread: Roman Tarnovetsky: "Re: [NTLK] Shareware/Freeware Licenses"
Reply: Roman Tarnovetsky: "Re: [NTLK] Shareware/Freeware Licenses"
Reply: Brian Pearce: "Re: [NTLK] Shareware/Freeware Licenses"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

on 05-09-2001 9:15, John M. Powell at iwillbefreedotcom_at_earthlink.net wrote:

> As 'technically' illegal as it is (and we SHOULD try to obey the law),
> I think we're sometimes being a little anal retentive
> about this.
>
> From a legal standpoint, maybe it's not abandoned, but from a practical
> real-world situation, if that's not abandoned, what is?
>
> Depends on the definition of is?

hear hear.

I couldn't agree more, though I'm not advocating illegality here,
abandonware has a category on it's own as far as I'm concerned.

Robert Benschop

--
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: Oliver Brose: "Re: [NTLK] voice recognition Newton"
Previous message: Seth Vidal: "[NTLK] blasphemy and maybe some hope"
In reply to: John M. Powell: "Re: [NTLK] Shareware/Freeware Licenses"
Next in thread: Roman Tarnovetsky: "Re: [NTLK] Shareware/Freeware Licenses"
Reply: Roman Tarnovetsky: "Re: [NTLK] Shareware/Freeware Licenses"
Reply: Brian Pearce: "Re: [NTLK] Shareware/Freeware Licenses"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Oct 03 2001 - 12:01:16 EDT