Re: [NTLK] Uh oh... ( Was Re: Newton Wanted ! )

• Next message: Brian: "Re: [NTLK] Uh oh... ( Was Re: Newton Wanted ! )"
• Previous message: Eric L. Strobel: "Re: [NTLK] Uh oh... ( Was Re: Newton Wanted ! )"
• In reply to: Eric L. Strobel: "Re: [NTLK] Uh oh... ( Was Re: Newton Wanted ! )"
• Next in thread: Brian: "Re: [NTLK] Uh oh... ( Was Re: Newton Wanted ! )"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Friday, October 19, 2001, at 10:35 , Eric L. Strobel wrote:

> I would've sent that off-list, but I thought that others might be
> curious as
> well. Since the quote was NOT about animal rights or even abortion, I
> figured it shouldn't generate a huge flame war. After all, the fellow
> quoted was apparently saying that infants that have been *successfully
> delivered into this world* can be killed without moral qualms.

*deep breath* Okay, this probably would lead to an interesting
discussion, but I'm not sure that Newtontalk is the appropriate
venue.

Zac

--
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

• Next message: Brian: "Re: [NTLK] Uh oh... ( Was Re: Newton Wanted ! )"
• Previous message: Eric L. Strobel: "Re: [NTLK] Uh oh... ( Was Re: Newton Wanted ! )"
• In reply to: Eric L. Strobel: "Re: [NTLK] Uh oh... ( Was Re: Newton Wanted ! )"
• Next in thread: Brian: "Re: [NTLK] Uh oh... ( Was Re: Newton Wanted ! )"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Nov 01 2001 - 10:02:21 EST