Re: [NTLK] why not split the list?

From: Matthew Robinson (matthew_at_crescent.org.uk)
Date: Tue Nov 20 2001 - 07:41:25 EST

Next message: Steve Weyer: "Re: [NTLK] SSL on Newton?"
Previous message: John Skinner: "[NTLK] Cover me... I'm goin' in!"
In reply to: mmcipollone: "Re: [NTLK] why not split the list?"
Next in thread: Eric L. Strobel: "Re: [NTLK] why not split the list?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Folks,
I have a possible solution! Create individual lists for:

OMP
110
120
130
2x00
emate
off-topic

and let people subscribe to them as required. At the same time leave
'newtontalk' alone but make is a 'superset' of the others - ie you post to OMP
and it will actually go to OMP and newtontalk. the reply-to's should make
return postings work ok. This will take some setting up!!!

This will probably mess up somewhere along the way when an answer gets posted
to the wrong list!

Oh, I'm actually in favour of just living with the ONE list we have now - but
I see other people's points of view on this. I'm lucky, I have adsl at home
and a big network at work so bandwidth isn't a problem.

Kind regards

Matthew

--
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: Steve Weyer: "Re: [NTLK] SSL on Newton?"
Previous message: John Skinner: "[NTLK] Cover me... I'm goin' in!"
In reply to: mmcipollone: "Re: [NTLK] why not split the list?"
Next in thread: Eric L. Strobel: "Re: [NTLK] why not split the list?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sat Dec 01 2001 - 20:03:23 EST