Re: [NTLK] More off-topic fun! Kirk or Picard?

From: Andy Wells (andywells_at_hotkey.net.au)
Date: Thu Nov 08 2001 - 00:33:57 EST

Next message: John Skinner: "Re: [NTLK] Problems with UMP 2000"
Previous message: Schneider, Stefan: "Re: [NTLK] AW: AW: Transistors vs. tubes"
Maybe in reply to: SlashDevNull: "[NTLK] More off-topic fun! Kirk or Picard?"
Next in thread: Christopher Plummer: "Re: [NTLK] More off-topic fun! Kirk or Picard?"
Reply: Christopher Plummer: "Re: [NTLK] More off-topic fun! Kirk or Picard?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Christopher Plummer plumcakes_at_mac.com wrote

>That's another tthing that makes Kirk better. The Karate chop. Picard
>could never do a Karate chop. Picard is a wuss. just cause he's part
>borg that doesn't make him better.

could never ......or would never ?
The thinking man over thuggery for me........besides

*ducking*

Kirk was nothing without Spock, at least Picard could think for
himself.......and he never needed a
bigger uniform as the series went on :-P

Andy

Andy Wells
Systems Administration
EDS Field Support
Launceston, Australia

--
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: John Skinner: "Re: [NTLK] Problems with UMP 2000"
Previous message: Schneider, Stefan: "Re: [NTLK] AW: AW: Transistors vs. tubes"
Maybe in reply to: SlashDevNull: "[NTLK] More off-topic fun! Kirk or Picard?"
Next in thread: Christopher Plummer: "Re: [NTLK] More off-topic fun! Kirk or Picard?"
Reply: Christopher Plummer: "Re: [NTLK] More off-topic fun! Kirk or Picard?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sat Dec 01 2001 - 20:02:20 EST