On Tue, 2001-11-06 at 02:25, brian.tiplady_at_astrazeneca.com wrote:
> On the second point I actually haven't a clue what you mean.
>
> The point I was trying to make is that, as with Napster, there is a problem
> with making copyrighted material available for unrestricted download (which
> is likely to be held to be an invitation to copyright violation) even when
> some of the use of the download facility may be perfectly legitimate
So, then, apparently I misunderstood you, and we're saying the same
thing. I'm trying to say that these NewtonBooks are exactly the same as
Napster -- copyrighted material available to arbitrary people with only
a very very thin amount of identification/authentication needed.
Whether you think that's a good or bad thing is not my intent to
discuss; I just thought you were making a point that this was
necessarily fair use, which it's really not, legally, for better or
worse.
Sigh.
-- R Pickett The people that once bestowed commands, consulships, Hayseed Networks legions, and all else, now meddles no more and longs emerson_at_hayseed.net eagerly for just two things -- bread and circuses.-- This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sat Dec 01 2001 - 20:02:12 EST