Re: [NTLK] So much for presumed obsolescence

From: Ivan Shaw (ishaw_at_sympatico.ca)
Date: Fri Jul 27 2001 - 11:20:14 EDT

Next message: Tim De Chant: "Re: [NTLK] 2X00 System Patch"
Previous message: Ivan Shaw: "Re: [NTLK] Timereporter for Newton"
Maybe in reply to: Ivan T. Shaw: "[NTLK] So much for presumed obsolescence"
Next in thread: Jeremy Bond Shepherd: "Re: [NTLK] So much for presumed obsolescence"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Fri, Jul 27 2001 Chris Stephens wrote:
>I also had my second port taken away, but they don't know
>about my Newton server. Actually, I work at a college, and
>our techs. don't know much about anything. I bought
>a 4 port hub at Best Buy (after rebate it was $5).

Such is the beauty of being at a place where DHCP usage is unmonitored. The ports here are each assigned to a static IP, so alternatives are harder to come by. Enterprise resource management tools also mean that you can't just go ahead and buy a router to hide behind.

-- Ivan T. Shaw, PhD http://www3.sympatico.ca/ishaw Propolis is "bee glue."

-- This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: Tim De Chant: "Re: [NTLK] 2X00 System Patch"
Previous message: Ivan Shaw: "Re: [NTLK] Timereporter for Newton"
Maybe in reply to: Ivan T. Shaw: "[NTLK] So much for presumed obsolescence"
Next in thread: Jeremy Bond Shepherd: "Re: [NTLK] So much for presumed obsolescence"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sun Sep 09 2001 - 19:50:23 EDT