Re: [NTLK] So much for presumed obsolescence

From: Ivan T. Shaw (ishaw_at_sympatico.ca)
Date: Sun Jul 22 2001 - 09:54:45 EDT

Next message: Ivan T. Shaw: "Re: [NTLK] newtontalk Digest V1 #81"
Previous message: Ivan T. Shaw: "Re: [NTLK] uMP2000/2100 vs. eMate"
In reply to: Adrian Carter: "Re: [NTLK] So much for presumed obsolescence"
Next in thread: PaulMmn: "Re: [NTLK] So much for presumed obsolescence"
Reply: PaulMmn: "Re: [NTLK] So much for presumed obsolescence"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 07:19 PM 7/21/01 +0000, Adrian Carter wrote:
>What was the guy's face like when you helped him out :)

Which one? The person who works at that particular company showed nothing
but relief since they were essentially locked out of their own network. The
nephew probably won't be invited back and I'm certain that he's acquiring a
whole new vocabulary to use when describing me.

-- Ivan T. Shaw, PhD http://www3.sympatico.ca/ishaw http://www.ivanshaw.com

-- This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: Ivan T. Shaw: "Re: [NTLK] newtontalk Digest V1 #81"
Previous message: Ivan T. Shaw: "Re: [NTLK] uMP2000/2100 vs. eMate"
In reply to: Adrian Carter: "Re: [NTLK] So much for presumed obsolescence"
Next in thread: PaulMmn: "Re: [NTLK] So much for presumed obsolescence"
Reply: PaulMmn: "Re: [NTLK] So much for presumed obsolescence"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sun Sep 09 2001 - 19:50:08 EDT