In a message dated 3/26/00 4:24:39 PM, jonglass@usa.net writes:
<< I hate to continue this thread, but the mistake was to think that cloning
would open market share. The truth is that Market share is the holy grail.
You can't find it by seeking it. Simply put, clones were _not_ increasing
market share, and were cutting horribly into Apple's profits. Dumping the
Newton was not only a marketing decision, but from what I understand, most
of the most important Newton engineers had already left Apple, and Apple no
longer had the resources to continue developing the Newton. (not that the
financial considerations didn't weigh heavily, nor that they weren't the
primary consideration, but it's difficult to ignore the lack of manpower
and technical expertise).
I know the above isn't the last word, but we do need to remember these
factors in Apple's (ie, Steve Job's) decisions >>
Jon,
You are quoting me out of context! somewhere in the missing part of my
post I stated how I think Apple should have created THE Windows enviroment
for PC and compatables rather that be at the mercy of Windows and Microsoft.
This would have increased it's software market and act as a bridge that
would lead PCers to Mac and or Mac clones.
The fact that clones were killing Apple profits to me says that Apple was
either overcharging for it's technology or was producing hardware inferior to
the clones, both of which I think were true.
sorry if I was unclear about this.
RobertRuff
******************************************
This NewtonTalk Message brought to you by:
EVOTE.COM, the ESPN of Politics on the
Internet. Visit EVOTE.COM for all the latest
news on Campaign 2000!
Visit http://www.evote.com today!
******************************************
Need Subscribe/Unsubscribe Info?
visit http://www.planetnewton.com
******************************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 03 2000 - 09:41:16 EDT