On 3/1/2000 4:01 PM, Laurent Daudelin
[mailto:laurent_daudelin@fanniemae.com] wrote:
>If the stationary introduces some data of its own, then you would need
>some kind of extension to the Dock/NCU to export them. I don't think that
>the current tools used to import/export/synchronize cannot make use of any
>additional data that might be stored in a standard soup like Names. In
>order to import/export, the tools that perform the process must have a
>knowledge of the data. So, the Dock/NCU have the knowledge of the built-in
>applications's soups and the fields that were in those soups when the
>tools were created/built. Without modifying the tools to make them aware
>of new information in some of the standard soups, there's nothing you can
>do.
>
>-Laurent.
The REALLY annoying thing is that the old NCK allowed programmers to
extend NCK to handle their app's data....and that it showed it on screen,
too.
I'd like to find the person who made the decision to remove that from NCU
and ask them what they were thinking.....or find out if they even WERE.
Thinking, that is. ;-)
- Bill
_____________________________________________________________________
\\ /, "Ink Different" at Info-Newt, the site for Newton PDAs
`( Info-Newt Newton news & info web site: http://www.info-newt.com/
\ Newton FTP Software archive: ftp://ftp.info-newt.com/
= Newton Community FAQ: http://www.info-newt.com/faq/
******************************************
This month's NewtonTalk brought to you by:
EVOTE.COM, the ultimate Political Junkie site on the 'Net.
The Clinton Administration, the George Bush
2000 Campaign, and almost every other major
U.S. politician has said something nasty
about us at some time. Find out why at:
http://www.evote.com
******************************************
Need Subscribe/Unsubscribe info?
Visit http://www.planetnewton.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 03 2000 - 09:41:05 EDT